Anonymous asked this question on 4/25/2000:
It's a shame that there has to be people on this board who seek to disrupt the once friendly, fun nature of this board, thereby turning it into a hostile environment. I can appreciate some of the critical answers of Scientology given, but there are also many blatantly staged questions being posed by people with agendas, as well, offering nothing but contempt.
Larry Bergen and Spirit (and others), thank you for your answers on friendly help on here.
It's just a shame.
desertphile gave this response on 4/25/2000:
It's a shame you feel that way. The truth is often painfull, but you will be much better off knowing the truth about Scientology and the Church of Scientology.
How is it possible for you to claim to be an "expert" about Scientology and not know the core beliefs of Scientology? Shouldn't people be told the truth? Shouldn't you first know what you are talking about before claiming to be an expert? Shouldn't you follow your OWN CREED and stop pissing in your oatmill about other people adding their opinions in this forum?
Why are you for censorship? Why can you not handle the truth? Why do you wish to deceive people by now allowing them to see the WHOLE TRUTH about Scientology and the Church of Scientology.
Just why do you wish to hide Scientology's beliefs? Are you ashamed of Scientology?
If you are not ashamned of Scientology, you will have no complaints about what the real experts in this forum write.
Untill you gain a real knowledge of Scientology, it seems deceptive IN THE EXTREME to me for you to be claiming to be an expert.
The same goes to "larry" and "spirit." They said they do not know about Lord Zenu, the Marcab Space Fleet invasion Hubbard warned us about, and a host of scores of basic, core Scientology beliefs and teachings. How then can they be "experts" when their knowledge of the BASICS is nonexistant? Why are they and you trying to deceive people? Are you trying to make Scientologists appear lying and deceitfull?
The average rating for this answer is 2.9.
Anonymous rated this answer a 1.