On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 23:11:05 GMT, firstname.lastname@example.org (Keith Henson) wrote:
>On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:36:16 GMT, email@example.com (Keith Henson)
>>Sometimes you just have to sit back in open mouthed astonishment at
>>the crooked lawyers and cult corrupted courts in Hemet.
>>Basic law say that after a case has gone to appeal the court of
>>original jurisdiction has no authority over the case. But here we see
>>the cult asking the judge who ruled against me in the civil case to
>>effectively dismiss the appeal by denying me the right to even *file*
>Bit of follow up. It may be that the cult filed motions in both
Decided to let the appeal court know what was filed in the lower court.
H. Keith Henson
176 Henry St. #45
Brantford, ON N3S 5C8 Canada
In Pro Per
RIVERSIDE SUPERIOUR COURT
HILARY DEZOTELL, KEN HODEN, and BRUCE WAGONER
Appellate No. 003381
Case No. HEC009673
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Attached Exhibit A is a motion before the trial court to dismiss the Notice of Appeal filed before this court.
Such an action is against the law and the rules of the California courts. I am informally instructed by counsel that this motion is illegal and cannot be granted by a trial court and that I need do nothing about it. I have however decided to notify this court about it.
As this court may be aware, my cases in Hemet have been rife with similar abuses. I have proof in the form of the unfolded, unmailed indictment that the DA's office attempted to frame me at the start with failure to appear. Judge Wojcik demonstrated frank fear of the cult in his chambers in the presence my lawyer James Harr. Judge Walker (who expressed grave First Amendment concerns about the case) recused himself on the thinnest excuse possible. Judge Wallersheim ruled in the cult's motions in lemine, denying witnesses and implying jail time for contempt if I was a witness in my own defense (I was forbidden to mention the cult's fair game policies or the deaths at the cult's compound which were the reason I was picketing). At the end of trial he admitted knowing former mafia lawyer Elliot Abelson who was openly directing DDA Robert Schwarz for the cult, then sealed parts of the record (in violation of the rules of the court) wiping appeal material from the case that he had previously ruled in open court was part of the record (the Frank Oliver documents the cult wanted suppressed). There is additional detailed history of court and DA abuses in the previous appeal papers.
In this case, the trial judge has already exceeded his authority by issuing a permanent injunction in a limited case. This is clearly in violation of the statutory authority given to courts in limited cases under CCP Section 86(a)(8). Given the previous history and that my lawyer reported the judge shaking like a leaf when reading a ruling prepared for him by the cult, you can see that I have reason to believe the Hemet courts are extra judicially influenced by the cult.
The court might consider contacting law enforcement in this matter. While many years of many people reporting cult's criminal activity and terrorizing people to the authorities has been ignored, they may pay more attention to a judge. On the other hand, the cult's corrupting influence may now be so pervasive that even a judge will be ignored.
H. Keith Henson, pro se Dated January 3, 2003