Hi all you lurking scn'ists,
While the Magoo and Morrigan types provided some quasi-entertainment, I will be getting back to more interesting subjects.
But first some observations regarding Morrigan might be of note to some lurking here. (you know who you are). 1. She did not answer one question re: what she is doing to correct the alteration of LRH's technology, and 2. She goes into quite the BPC over my asking her these questions, with such off-topic responses as "you left your friends" "you didn't stand and fight", quite dramatic surely, but in the face of the subject I am currently discussing re: our SP Declares, exactly who left who?
Here is Morrigan throwing rocks on her computer at all who dare to stand and fight the criminality and violations of the creeds and codes of Scientology.
Hypocrisy is quite the in vogue modus operandi in the Church today, and if you or anyone on ARS think she is here without OSA knowing it, you don't know the current Church management at all.
OSA "doesn't" read this newsgroup, and pigs now fly.
Well,that about covers the subject of Morrigan, now onto more enlightening matters.
Let's carry on with the comparison of Mike's and my Declares.
"Mike began contacting Scientologists in the field, spreading Black PR about Flag and LRHís technology of confessionals." By his actions Mike committed the following suppressive act:
"Attempting to undermine or advising or condoning the abandonment or reduction of the use of the full technology of locating and handling overts, evil purposes, destructive intentions and nonsurvival considerations."
Let's go over Black PR
Definition 3. Admin Dictionary
"the activity called black propaganda consists of spreading lies by bidden sources. It inevitably results in injustices being done by those who operate without verifying the truth"
Excerpted from confidential OSA Intelligence HAT
: "It is my intention that by the use of professional PR tactics any opposition be not only dulled but permanently eradicated... If there will be a long-term threat, you are to immediately evaluate and originate a black PR campaign to destroy the person's repute and to discredit them so thoroughly that they will be ostracized."
Hmmmm, Mike says that one of the things that Ben Shaw told Greg Barnes, is that we were considered a "long term threat", we all at the time were wondering what the heck does that mean?? Makes sense now doesn't it, someone decided that we were one. We would definitely be considered that by the actual SP's running the Church. Could it be that this Sp Declare, as well as the Black PR campaign, were done to destroy our reputes and discredit us so thoroughly that we would be ostracized?
Now who (or what) would want to do such a thing as mount a full scale Black PR campaign against us for trying to apply standard tech, and get others to do so as well?
I'll let you all answer that by your big selves.
Now remember, Black PR by definition is LIES. Read that again LIES.
So, now, one and all, is this HCOB a lie?
HCOB C/s Series 73 RB
"b) Pre-OTs in the area between the beginning of New OT VI (Solo NOTS Auditing Course) and the completion of New OT VII (Solo NOTS) may not receive any other auditing, with the exception of those services allowed in the No-Interference Area (between the start of New OT I and the completion of OT III) for pre-OTs who are stalled or moving slowly."
Pre-OTs progressing well in the No-Interference Area should not be interfered with by Sec Checking or anything else. However, when a pre-OT is stalled or moving slowly, any of the actions listed below, as appropriate, can be ordered by a qualified C/S
1) Non-audited PTS handlings
2) Confessionals and O/Ws
3) The handling of postulates, considerations, attitudes, evil purposes or evil intentions (False Purpose Rundown)
4) Service Fac handling (bracket method only, no R3RA)
5) Disagreement Checks"
Or even the one that is actually by LRH, (not assisted by RTRC), is this a lie too?
"SECTION III: THOSE PERSONS COMPLETED ON OT III AND/OR COMPLETED ON ANY LEVEL ABOVE OT III:
A. CAN BE GIVEN, BETWEEN ANY OT LEVELS ABOVE OT III:
Any required PTS Handling that does not use Dianetics.
Prepared Lists,as applicable,with special instructions followed for handlings on
L10, L11, L12.
The handling of postulates, considerations, attitudes, evil purposes or evil intentions.
False Purpose Rundown.
Black PR handling.
Method One Word Clearing."
(Note that it says above BETWEEN OT levels.
Or how about this one, is it a lie too?
HCOB 8 March 1982 Confessionals And The Non Interference Zone.
A pre-OT who is running well and making case gain should not be interrupted"
Guess that about answers that question, these are not lies.
Ok, so what did Michael contact other scientologists about, and why?
He sent them the full report of which my "I am a SNCC Graduate this is my story" post was a part of.
Which of course is about the above references, none of which would be applied by Flag.
So, RTC was consulted, and refreshing our memory here, this is what RTC said about applying these references,
from interview with Marina Pezzotti
"Marina says, well Iím not going to change the whole line. Itís not going to hurt you to get a sec check. If there is nothing on the question it will F/N." "Marina says itís not a technical point, itís a security point."
"Virginia then said, does he say anywhere in here that you can sec check for security purposes? Marina says no."
"Marina said ok, ok, but Iím still not changing the line."
"Marina says Iím not changing the whole line, but I might change it for you."
Ok ladies and gentleman, here's a question for you, if RTC, who is very specifically charged with Keeping Scientology Working, can say things like above, WHILE HAVING FULL KNOWLEDGE OF VIOLATING LRH's HCOB's in doing so, whose hat is it to ensure KSW is applied?
RTC is the top of the org board, now what?
KSW Series 1
" SCIENTOLOGY WILL KEEP WORKING ONLY AS LONG AS YOU (italics) DO YOUR PART TO KEEP IT WORKING BY APPLYING THIS POLICY LETTER."
"NO MATTER WHERE YOU ARE IN SCIENTOLOGY, ON STAFF OR NOT, THIS POLICY LETTER HAS SOMETHING TO DO WITH YOU."
So, now, whose hat is it to correct this ultimately?
That's right, you and me and everyone else in Scientology.
If you remember, the beginning of the Black PR campaign was by Barbara Nelson, Solo Nots D of P.
From my story
October 4, 1998
D of P Barbara Nelson writes a KR after the meeting on October 3, 1998.
She says that Virginia McClaughry and Greg and Debra Barnes disagree with sec checking mid-Solo NOTS. She says they were not at all interested at looking at other references on the value of sec checking.
Virginia and Greg and Debra find out about this KR later. They correct the false data and ask for a withdrawal and Barbara withdraws it. The correct data is that no one disagreed with sec checking, the statement was that HCOB C/S Series 73 was not being applied.
Also, no one ever said they were not interested in seeing other references on sec checking, on the contrary, Barbara was told that they did want to see the other references she was talking about."
The meeting with Marina mentioned above was in December.
After this meeting, a full scale Black PR campaign saying essentially what Barbara Nelson had said was begun. (I will post some of these docs soon)
Now as an aside, one could wonder if RTC and OSA decided we might be long-term threats AFTER Marina saw I wasn't going to budge on it.
Seems highly likely actually.
Ok so now we are faced with RTC who isn't what they said they are, and a Black PR campaign, what to do?
PR Series 18 How to handle Black Propaganda
"It is a long-to-find and hard-learned fact that people who engage in black propaganda have big bursting crimes to hide.
They do not have little (italics) crimes. They have BIG ones.
One's own ability to confront evil may be too low to really grasp the black propagandist's crimes or believe they exist.
Such people are often SANCTIMONIOUS hypocrites. They are usually arrogant and will not parley (have conferences with a foe). They appear so terribly sure they are RIGHT that it fairly shakes one's confidence that they could ever do anything wrong.
Thus the black propagandist is not detectable as such in many cases. The lordly institution, the lofty society, the glittering country are far, far above such a nasty psychotic trick as a studied, financed, expertly run campaign of vicious lies.
Thus they are believed, Or their servants believed. And their campaigns can be very (italics) effective.
...........And it makes it hard to get anything bad about them (italics) believed.
"But under all this are real (italics) crimes....."
"Believe that. For in the course of your counterattack you may despair of ever finding anything.
But you will find it."
"But there is no truth in the bad guys always cause their own downfall...."
"Therefore it is vital (italics) to handle the matter. One can't just hope it will all go away. It won't........."
"ONLY COUNTERATTACK HANDLES."
"One has to fill the vacuum of the counterpropagandist's evil deeds. As these are never exposed to view, there is a vacuum there."
And there you have it, Mike applied PR Series 18 in the face of a BLACK PR campaign, as well as KSW.
He mailed 10 ex go friends of his, and exposed the crimes he had found (letter to be posted shortly regarding initial crimes found), as well as the Scientology HIGH CRIMES found, and asked them to apply KSW as well.
Not lies, as proven above, and not Black PR therefore.
Whew! I didn't know there would be this much just on one sentence of this SP Declare. Guess when a generality is there it hides a LOT of data, hmmm?
It's late, will do more tomorrow or so.
P.S. Notice in PR series 18 it does not exclude ANYONE, and that includes the CHurch, or other "scientologists". If someone runs a Black PR campaign on you, then they have crimes.
Which kinda puts the critics in a different light, doesn't it? (well, some of them anyway). Some of them are actually exposing some quite truthful crimes of the current Church Management.
So get your own ability to confront evil up guys, you don't want to be outdone by supposed "critics" do you?
P.P.S You know, I had never even been anywhere on the internet that was critical of the CHurch until AFTER my comm ev, and the black pr campaign which it resulted from. I didn't even know there was such stuff!
And (critics you are going to love this), I went because that's what it says to do in PR Series 18 and I quote
"However, a black propagandist often has many (italics) other enemies. These have sometimes gathered data."
Since the Black Propagandist was My very own Church, where to apply this? Welcome to the world of critics and "SP's, and all their sites, data, as well as government and public records.
So there was scientology tech in use guys.
So alice in wonderland................isn't it?