From: "Virginia McClaughry" <[email protected]>
Subject: post 11; More comm to april
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 20:08:17 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Ethics Section AO Sc 3/28/99
Thank you for faxing me back.
I appreciate your letting me know that you are willing to assist me in any way, Thank you.
The next thing is your report on me, based off an interview with Bill.
What I had originally looked at on this report, was similar to Wendy’s in that Bill also asked me questions about the cycle, which I then answered truthfully. The difference was that Bill could experience this communication somewhat, but still altered some of my communication. I have known for quite a while that Bill will alter my communication if it is at a level of truth that Bill cannot have, which has occurred throughout my long association with Bill. I had not fully confronted this in the past, or done any direct handling with Bill on it.
I have handled this with Bill by first getting him to see that when he asks me something, I answer him with the truth, which he then cannot experience easily and ARC breaks. I then told him that from then on I would only give him no-answer answers, or social responses, in regards to this cycle. If he wished to have a higher level of truth than that, he would have to specifically ask, and that it would be completely his responsibility, without any blame of me for answering him truthfully. Bill was happy with this, and it put him at Cause on the cycle.
As in Wendy’s reports, the fact still remains that the report written by you with data on what Bill said in his interview, contains false and altered data on my communications to Bill, which needs to be corrected.
Please take a look at this report, and my withdrawal request data, in a new unit of time.
I look forward to hearing from you what your decision is, so that we can then move onto the next thing I need assistance on.