post 43: "non Enturbulation" order

From: "Virginia McClaughry" <[email protected]>
Subject: post 43: "non Enturbulation" order
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 21:54:40 -0800
Message-ID: <[email protected]>

Note: all this became a moot point, as april then launched into a commev on all of us, not long after, despite my not saying anything during that period.

MAA SC April 15 March 1999 ---------------------- Virginia McClaughry


Re: Non-Enturb Order
cc: IJC
cc: Virginia’s Ethics file

As you know, you have threatened to issue a Non-Enturbulation Order on me, based off of reports from Wendy Ettricks, and you, (written on me), and a report by Judy Weigand, which is written on my husband.

Regardless of that these reports are false, which I am taking the appropriate actions to handle, I wish to point out that I have not talked with anyone new on this cycle, as requested, and I have stated this concept in writing to you as well.

As you said, “if you receive one more report”, bear in mind that our agreement starts from the date of my response to you, and you will have no reports on me from conversing with anyone new after that date.

It was my impression that your wish is that I not tell any further person about this whole cycle, correct?

I intend to do exactly that.

So, in order to prevent injustice on this cycle, please pay attention to WHEN, if you do happen to get any other report on a time period re: the Non-Enturb order.