Back in June 2013, the founder of Elizabeth & Clarke, Melanie Moore, provided me with a $100 credit to keep me as a customer after shipping snafus meant that I wouldn’t get my June shipment until nearly July. I accepted the credit, even though this was the third time that I had experienced shipping delays, and despite the fact that two of my shirts were beginning to show quality issues after just two washings (the pocket was unraveling from my Blackwell tank, and my Browning flannel shirt had started to pill). Yet I really wanted to give Elizabeth & Clarke another chance. There was no indication in the email from Ms. Moore that my account was closed in any way. In September 2013, Elizabeth & Clarke released information on its Winter 2013 collection. The collection features only short-sleeved and a sleeveless option (well, one long-sleeved option out of five shirts, but it’s not a new style). But even worse, Elizabeth & Clarke named a shirt after a highly controversial U.S. Senator, Elizabeth Warren (D-MA). (And yes, on its website, Elizabeth & Clarke says, “Named after our favorite Senator…”, so there is no question that it named the blouse after Senator Warren.) Senator Warren is anti-small business, has lied about her heritage to get ahead, and votes lockstep with her party without regard to her constituents. In other words, Senator Warren is not a woman to be admired. I posted on Elizabeth & Clarke’s Facebook page about my displeasure regarding the naming; the company deleted the comment and banned me from posting without explanation. I emailed it about how it wasn’t appropriate to name a shirt after someone so controversial; Elizabeth & Clarke never responded. Finally, I logged into my account, and I noticed my $100 credit was missing. It had been reduced to $1. I called Elizabeth & Clarke’s customer service number. I didn’t get the name of the customer disservice representative I spoke to, but that three-and-a-half minute call was a prime example of how not to treat paying customers: Me: I’m calling because my credit has vanished from my account. Rep (who is most likely Melanie Moore) looks up account: Oh, your account has been closed. Me: What? Why was it closed? Rep: I don’t know. But it’s closed. Me: Where’s my credit? Rep: I don’t know. What do you want us to do? Me: Well, I would have liked to have kept my credit, and I certainly would have liked a response to my Facebook post— Rep: Oh, I remember you. We allow comments about the quality and style of our shirts, but we don’t allow hatred toward women— Me: How is disliking the name of a shirt “hatred toward women?” Rep: We don’t allow hate speech. Me: I understand, but how is posting that Elizabeth Warren is a bad Senator and lied about her heritage— Rep (getting angry): We don’t allow hatred toward women. That’s hate speech. Me: How is that hate speech? You named a shirt after a controversial— Rep: We’re a private company and we can do what we want. Me (incredulous): Maybe you should think about that, and stop arguing with customers. We’re the ones who keep you in business. You may be a private company, but I’m a private citizen, and conservative women wear shirts too. Elizabeth & Clarke canceled my account, revoked my credit spitefully, deleted my Facebook post, never responded to my email, and never responded to my Tweets. Apparently hatred toward conservative women, or women who disagree with the company or its ultra-liberal founder, Melanie Moore, is okay. Elizabeth & Clarke then libeled me to the Better Business Bureau. When I complained to the Better Business Bureau about Elizabeth & Clarke’s practices and demanded that the company purge all my personally identifying information from its database, Elizabeth & Clarke justified removing my credit and closing my account by providing the Better Business bureau with falsehoods, misinformation, and flat-out libel. The company spent a great deal of time mining my social media accounts and blogs to attempt to portray me in the worst possible light, ignoring the fact that I had written a pretty glowing review in December 2012 of its service and accusing me of “harassment” and “tortious interference with [its] business.” Given the questionable quality of the merchandise and the reprehensible attitude toward customers that disagree with it, I would avoid Elizabeth & Clarke at all costs. Elizabeth & Clarke is a legally and ethically moribund company. In other words, steer clear. .
We could not verify ONE single thing David Ruch told us. National mortgage company=he has a couple of people working out of their home;
Eastern Land Capital Partners Limited (ELCP) were introduced to us through two investment brokers :Mbuso Capital(South Africa) and NISK
I have been scammed by krysztal.nl, at the end of Mild October 2016, I made a hard decision : to buy some research chemicals for sale in
En tus terapias definiras tu amor propio, valoraras tu aceptacion y descrubiras el proposito de tu vida. Tambien aprenderas a sanar tus
Trying to cancel but no reply. What to do? Didn’t realize we were being charged monthly. Previous Review Next Review
I wish I never met Stanley (Kefiya Ouro), he talks about Jesus but he is the Devil. Took my car for repair, instead of fixing it, he took
I bought windows for the back of my home (7 windows) and the front (8). 3 of the original 7 are leaking and fogging and they are 6 years
I offer a non-pathologizing way of working with extreme feelings and beliefs that get in the way of connecting to others. My therapeutic
This complaint and/or review was posted on HolySmoke.org on 19:55 pm, December 15, 2018 (CST) and is a permanent record located at: https://www.holysmoke.org/scam/elizabeth-clarke-review/.
The reviews & complaints posted about Elizabeth & Clarke was submitted by a member or guest on this website. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. HolySmoke.org does not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is simply a consumer grievance free-speech platform. As such, HolySmoke.org cannot be held liable for the complaints and reviews posted about Elizabeth & Clarke as per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.