Mark Bradshaw of SBH

Mark Bradshaw of SBH Review

Reviews: 1

1 RATING
(1)

Total views: 4059

Published: 07 September 2019

Posted by: Anonymously

Mark Bradshaw had nearly a quarter of a million dollars in fees disgorged from Judge Albert in Federal Court Oct 22, 2014. Federal Judge finds The Chap 11 BK worked was found to have no value to the reorganization of the estate. Mark Bradshaw personally commited several inconsistent stories to the Judge to cover up the pooor work. In a concensus of recomendation to Judge Albert NO fees should be allowed, the testimony of debitor who confirmed SBH and Mark Bradshaw were in potential violation of the automatic stay, and ethics of the firm came into question, Judge Albert required the testimony of Managing Partner Len Shulman to refute sworn testimony of debitor. The court found the work of Mark Bradshaw a disgrace and called for testimony of Len Shulman. Mark Bradshaw declined to take the stand in defense of his partner. It was a great day for all Americans as Judge alberts ruling affirms that rules, ethics and acting as Gentlemen are of greater importance than a Law firm of 25 years and a reputation .

Rate and Write a Review on Mark Bradshaw of SBH

Sending

Be an Informed Consumer

An informed consumer is capable of making sensible decisions, gains insight about a business prior to an interaction or transaction. Our newsletter provides resources and information that informs you, the consumer. of such things as consumer rights and protection.