Fact: Spamhaus and have added innocent IP blocks to their blacklists. Steve Linford extortionist. The anti-spammer extotion goes like this: “Anyone who gets service from a network friendly to spammers is supporting the spammers and therefore our enemy.” (The friend of my enemy is my enemy too?) So here”s how this goes. Once a network provider is branded “a communist”…er excuse me…”a spammer”, ALL of their ranges are blocked. Typically a network provider is providing services for smaller service providers, many of whom would never and have never engaged in spamming of any kind. No notice is really given on these blacklisting events, rather you find out when mail starts bouncing to some destination. Usually an end customer is the first to notice, and that customers is directed by the bounce to complain to…their own internet server provider! In essence, the customer is tricked into presenting the terrorist anti-spam agenda.The ISP turns around and finds out that -their- provider (or provider”s provider) is what the anti-spam zealots want “silenced”. Until that target complies with their arbitrary agenda (usually of the form “stop spamming”, but this is not always true…see below), everyone else has to suffer with electronic mail blocks. What”s wrong with this? Everything. * First and foremost, the most often heard reason anti-spammers are so rabid about anti-spam is “it makes electronic mail unusable for average people”. If this is true, then how does blocking innocent email help this situation? In fact, blacklisting innocents contributes to the problem. The hypocrisy here is so thick I doubt even a knife can cut it. * The dishonor of the practice of blacklists is amazing. Many naive internet mail administrators add blacklists like spamhaus “because they work to reduce spam”. Lots of these sites have no idea that they are being cut off from legitimate email because of these machinations. If their customers really knew that they were cutoff, I wonder how many would still buy service? Getting rid of spam is one thing, blocking that key business email that means $100K in sales is quite another. Lets take this one step further. Person A buys email service from ISP X who is using Spamhaus to block spam email. Person A”s daughter, who”s income is very low due to being a student in college, buys email service from ISP Y (because it”s cheap) who uses IAP S as their connectivity. ISP Y buys network from IAP S because it”s cheap. Due to real life constraints, the only contact Person A has with their daughter is email. IAP S suddenly gets put on the anti-spam master blacklist. The same day, Person A”s daughter has a car accident. A roommate desperately tries to send email to Person A but it”s blocked. Worse, it”s blocked because these zealots have an idealogical cause which is set up to be more important than a person”s life. This is the height of dishonor. * The practice is quite criminal by many definitions and with criminals on all sides: o Any ISP that is blocked is told to “comply with our demands or be blacklisted” (a.k.a. extortion). o Attacking innocents in the name of their cause (a.k.a. terrorism). o Since the control of the blacklist is out of the hands of the service provider who subscribes to it, by law you must clearly state “random people may be blocked to your email box by other people who are not under our control” before selling “email services”. I”ve never seen this stated on any ISP ad. (a.k.a false advertising) o Blacklisting ISPs is a good way of knocking them out of business (a.k.a restraint of trade) o If spam ever goes away, these organizations will also. Thus they have a vested interest in keeping spam alive (a.k.a playing both sides of the street) Do note that the anti-spammers claim these practices are not criminal and will “reduce economic support for the “spam friendly” ISPs”. This claim is quite erroneous: Fact: Spammer companies have far more money than most innocents. Yep, to the tune of millions of dollars per month. SPAM is big business. Do you think that the income of one little ISP with 1000 customers is going to make any difference against the large income of a spam company? No! All that does is clear more bandwidth for the spammers to use, should the little ISP cave in and switch to another provider. While there”s no proof (that I”m aware of), it”s not so far fetched to open up questions of collusion between “the providers that are anti-spam” and the “anti-spam blacklists”. Certain providers, to compete, may pay the blacklist groups lots of money to keep attacking innocents, which gets them more customers in the long run as ISPs fold because they cant afford the connectivity provided by the “anti-spam supporter” providers. I”ve established some things here: 1. In my opinion, blacklists are bad. 2. The anti-spammers are resorting to clearly criminal activities to further their goals: extortion, restraint-of-trade and, terrorism. If he likes terror, not me as I am a nice person who wouldn”t hurt a fly, but i”m sure that their are people out their that would like to show him what terror is all about.
This complaint and/or review was posted on HolySmoke.org on 12:11 pm, January 18, 2020 (CST) and is a permanent record located at: https://www.holysmoke.org/scam/spamhaus/.
The reviews & complaints posted about Spamhaus was submitted by a member or guest on this website. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. HolySmoke.org does not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is simply a consumer grievance free-speech platform. As such, HolySmoke.org cannot be held liable for the complaints and reviews posted about Spamhaus as per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Be an Informed Consumer
An informed consumer is capable of making sensible decisions, gains insight about a business prior to an interaction or transaction. Our newsletter provides resources and information that informs you, the consumer. of such things as consumer rights and protection.