This is an extortion site. I mistakenly believed that the money I paid towards this purchase would assist me in cleaning up my historical legal record. This “Review” they conducted is nothing of the kind; they are going off of past governmental records that have since been archived and are no longer valid for public display on the internet, though they claim the “Freedom of Information Act” as their source. They are under investigation by the Department of Justice and are under litigation at the moment, and now I see why. I want my money back as this organization did not do anything for my record, and now they want an additional $421 from me to actually clear up my history. I have emails to prove all of this, as well as communication from the primary attorney in the litigation and the creator of a website dedicated to bringing down this extortion site. When I merely asked a question about the owner of the business, the conversation on the other end turned into multiple defensive emails and VERY unprofessional.
Customers reviews and complaints
WRITE A REVIEWRate and Write a Review on The Sex Offender Archive
This complaint and/or review was posted on HolySmoke.org on 11:48 am, December 22, 2018 (CST) and is a permanent record located at: https://www.holysmoke.org/scam/the-sex-offender-archive-review/.
The reviews & complaints posted about The Sex Offender Archive was submitted by a member or guest on this website. Any and all opinions and information are published as is. HolySmoke.org does not edit or remove any aspect of the report and is simply a consumer grievance free-speech platform. As such, HolySmoke.org cannot be held liable for the complaints and reviews posted about The Sex Offender Archive as per Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
Business Advocacy Program
Advocacy program is a relationship between you and your most engaged consumers – the ones that choose to go a level higher to hold you accountable.
Outdated information
This is a fraudulent site. They certainly have been getting away with posting false and incorrect information. They definitely need to be held accountable. If a site wants to post information about the public, its incumbent on them to ensure accuracy and correctness.